Search for: All records

Abstract Computational thinking is crucial for STEM researchers and practitioners, as it involves more than just developing skills—it is a way of thinking that enables effective problem-solving. STEM disciplines approach different problems and as such employ computational thinking uniquely, so students cannot rely solely on computer science to develop computational thinking. Less attention has been given to social aspects of computation, such as collaborating and communicating with and about computation even though social aspects are essential to problem solving. We utilized computational literacy as an alternative framework that explicitly includes social elements as a primary pillar. We conducted 15 interviews with STEM researchers to identify and organize the social aspects that play a role in their research. We organized goals by motivation (persuasion and productivity) and representation (visual and non-visual) to contextualize the use of communication in computation. We found that researchers use computation to explain research results, navigate decision making, establish rigor, ensure reproducibility, facilitate lab stability, and promote research efficiency. We used Activity Theory to describe the tools, norms, and communities associated with these goals to offer a more detailed framework for the social pillar of computational literacy within the context of science and engineering. Examples from each discipline within STEM are described. This social computational literacy framework can act as a guide for STEM educators and practitioners alike to use and teach social aspects of computation. 

Joining a research group is one of the most important events on a graduate student’s path to becoming an independent physics researcher and earning a Ph.D. However, graduate students’ perspectives on the experience of finding a research group are not well documented in the literature. Understanding these perspectives is crucial for evaluating whether departments are providing students with adequate support while they search for a research group, and how difficulties during this process contribute to attrition. Semistructured interviews with $N=20$first and second year physics Ph.D. students reveal that incoming graduate students see joining a research group as a significant decision, and recognize that it may impact whether they will be able to complete the program. We found that students who struggled to find a group felt isolated and worried about falling behind their peers, whereas students who were able to immerse themselves in a positive group environment reported increased sense of belonging in their programs. The process of finding a research group often held differential importance for students identifying as women and nonbinary, who at times reported having to deprioritize their preferred research topic in order to be part of a more inclusive working environment. Although incoming graduate students characterized joining a research group as a significant decision, they often felt unprepared to make it. Moreover, they perceived an overall lack of guidance and structure from their departments, and characterized coursework as a barrier to searching for a group. Our findings suggest that providing students with better support during their group search process could help improve retention, particularly for traditionally underrepresented students, and improve students’ overall satisfaction in their graduate programs. Published by the American Physical Society2024